When the three functions run on the same general ledger, the reconciliation problem disappears. Not because it's been solved — because it was never created. Every figure on every report traces to the journal entry that produced it. One source. No exceptions.

The reporting system was bought from one vendor. The accounting system was bought from another. The aggregation tool came from a third. Each one owns a copy of the data. Each one exports to the next. The close runs through the reconciliation gaps between them and every month, someone on your team spends a week proving the numbers tie.


That work isn't a feature of the stack. It's the cost of three systems pretending to be one. The principal feels it. The reporting timeline carries it. And every new entity, new fund vintage or new asset class makes it worse.
For private fund managers, the same problem takes a different form. The fund administrator runs one set of books. The GP runs another. The waterfall lives in a spreadsheet maintained alongside the fund agreement, not derived from it. K-1s get produced from a separate system that doesn't talk to either. The persona is different. The reconciliation problem is identical.
The architectural decision that resolves it isn't a better integration. It's the absence of one.
The Archway platform was built as one system, not assembled from components. Every capability below runs from the same general ledger, the same book of record, the same source. No reconciliation between modules. No data crossing a boundary to get from one function to the next.

Single family offices, multi-family offices, private banks and private fund managers. Every audience runs on the same general ledger, the same book of record, the same architecture. How each segment uses it is specific to them.
Look-through reporting across trusts, LLCs and family partnerships. Direct feeds from every custodian, bank and account the household uses. Investment reporting, financial reporting and cash and expense management on one ledger — so the principal's complete picture is always current, always traceable, always defensible.

Single Family Office
·
Chief Financial Officer
How does Archway compare to the competition?
Archway is differentiated by its ledger-based architecture and operating services model. Rather than treating aggregation, accounting, and reporting as separate functions, Archway brings them together on the same book of record. For complex family offices, wealth advisory firms, private banks, and private fund managers, this creates a more connected foundation for accounting, investing, operations, reporting, and client delivery.
How is pricing structured?
Fixed annual pricing is based on scope, including entities, services, and users, not assets under management.
Can we run our own operations, or does Archway run them?
You have options. Your team can operate the technology directly, Archway's team can manage the software and process through outsourced services, or the engagement can be structured as a hybrid model. Each model runs on the same platform and book of record. Transitioning between models does not require a data migration.
What does implementation look like?
Scope and timeline are defined during the due diligence process and vary by complexity. Archway's implementation team manages the process. Projects can range from weeks to months, and specific timelines are provided after a joint scoping exercise.
What entity structures does the platform support?
The platform supports trusts, LLCs, partnerships, foundations, private funds, fund of funds, mutual funds, pooled cash vehicles, omnibuses, and individuals inside the same general ledger, each with its own entity hierarchy and chart of accounts.
How does aggregation work?
Archway supports direct feeds from major U.S. and international banks, prime brokers, and clearing firms — plus the regional and local banks other platforms don't cover. Transaction-level detail for managed assets, automated ingestion for held-away assets, and manual controls where data only arrives quarterly.
How does the platform handle the IBOR and ABOR?
Archway's platform is the source for both the investment book of record and the accounting book of record. They are not two separate systems. It is the same foundational data viewed from two angles. Every reported number traces back to the journal entry that produced it, giving teams a clear connection between investment activity, accounting records, and reporting outputs.





We use cookies to run this site, understand how it's used, and improve your experience. Choose which you allow — you can change this anytime. See our Cookie Policy.
Required for the site to function — security, network and accessibility. Always on.
Help us understand which pages are visited so we can improve the experience.
Used to deliver and measure relevant messaging across channels.
Remember choices like region and layout to personalise your visit.